Dave
Thanks for looking into my query.
The system is being analysed to B31.3. Yes, the restraint loads are different in W+P1 cases. Please see below an extract from the restraint summary.
When a P1 (SUS) alone is run, at the node cited below, the restraint loads are zero in both programs.
I had PD/4t set as “False” in both programs.
I am attaching zip files of both calc’s. That will provide you with the details required.
Felix
ps: AdditionalIy, we checked by opening the CII 2013 model using CII 2016 (reverse of my initial exercise), in that instance the results matched.
CII 2016 (V8)
LOAD CASE DEFINITION KEY
CASE 1 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1
CASE 2 (OPE) W+D1+T2+P1
CASE 3 (OPE) W+D1+T3+P1
CASE 4 (SUS) W+P1
CASE 5 (SUS) WNC
CASE 6 (SUS) W
Node Load Case FX N. FY N. FZ N. MX N.m. MY N.m. MZ N.m.
70 Rigid +Y
1(OPE) -215 -2535 118 0 0 0
2(OPE) -220 -2556 113 0 0 0
3(OPE) 27 -2068 205 0 0 0
4(SUS) 0 -2641 0 0 0 0
5(SUS) 4 -1853 185 0 0 0
6(SUS) -22 -2056 204 0 0 0
CII 2013 (V6)
LOAD CASE DEFINITION KEY
CASE 1 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1
CASE 2 (OPE) W+D1+T2+P1
CASE 3 (OPE) W+D1+T3+P1
CASE 4 (SUS) W+P1
CASE 5 (SUS) WNC
CASE 6 (SUS) W
Node Load Case FX N. FY N. FZ N. MX N.m. MY N.m. MZ N.m.
70 Rigid +Y
1(OPE) -232 -2590 106 0 0 0
2(OPE) -237 -2613 101 0 0 0
3(OPE) 29 -2068 205 0 0 0
4(SUS) -21 -2051 204 0 0 0
5(SUS) 4 -1853 185 0 0 0
6(SUS) -22 -2056 204 0 0 0
Attachments
CALC_CII_V8.zip (310 downloads)CALC_CII_V6.zip (310 downloads)