I agree. This is why I think that "hot sustained" is not valid for non-linear systems (i.e. on earth)

I see the things this way:

- there is a concept "hot sustained"
- this concept need to be validated
- validation can be done against something reliable
- need to take a system with no lift supports and to apply this "hot sustained" concept (please see the file)
- results need to be the same

But the results are not the same.

Which one is not right? "hot sustained" or classic way?

I simply can not believe in an answer type "both are right"

Best regards,