There are a few general engineering topics mixed in with the CAESAR 2 specific items.

Sections 1 & 7 appear to be going the right direction, but as I read them these following items belong in a new section "engineering concepts":

5.b, 5.c, 5.d, and maybe 7.b.

These questions aren't particular to CAESAR II. I understand this "test" would identify those ready to sit down, plug in, and churn out work with your software. That's excellent. But there are other populations out there that managers may wish to hire or avoid... for instance:
1. The computer wizard who doesn't know piping engineering.
2. The expert engineer who is technologically handicapped.
3. The engineer who knows some other software.

Maybe that information doesn't immediately help COADE's bottom line but please don't prejudice a manager against Case #3 who may turn into an excellent CAESAR II user. Similarly, Case #2 may make an excellent QA/QC guy even if he isn't quick with the inputs. Properly categorizing questions and clearly reporting them is key.

SP