Hi, there!

I believe your problem is case no. 6, where the actual Design/Operating loading case (pressure, weight and Thermal Expansion applied simultaneously) has been qualified as SUStained case instead of OPErating case. Most probably, the actual SUS case (no. 21) yields to pertinent results.

In fact, you've defined correctly this case as case no. 4. I believe it's a simple absent mindedness. You should delete case no. 6 and renumber the loading cases accordingly. "Shr" did this already....


Regards,