Topic Options
#833 - 12/10/02 09:36 AM Sockolet - Modelling
R Thiagarajan Offline
Member

Registered: 12/05/02
Posts: 4
Loc: India
In Casear II Ver 4.3, we do not have facility to compute SIF for brach type "Sockolet". Weldolet has "BW" connection at branch end whereas Sockolet has "SW" connection. However, the Olet which is sitting on the header pipe has same configuration. Hence shall I consider "Sockolet" as same as "Weldolet" as far as branch type is defined, as we intend to calculate SIF for the branch. Could anybody support this logic?
_________________________
Thiagarajan

Top
#834 - 12/10/02 12:04 PM Re: Sockolet - Modelling
Anindya Offline
Member

Registered: 09/14/02
Posts: 58
Loc: India
Mr. Thiagarajan :
Weldolet is defined in the code terminology as "Branch welded on" fitting and Sweepolet as "branch welded in ". However there is no reference to a sockolet, but SIf is prescribed for a Socket weld.

In my opinion it can be done like this:

At the junction point define a weldolet and at the end of the weldolet define a SW connection.This will simulate the effect of a sockolet.

Regards

Anindya Bhattacharya

Stress analyst

Bechtel Corporation
_________________________
Anindya Bhattacharya

Top
#835 - 12/11/02 06:55 AM Re: Sockolet - Modelling
ashish Offline
Member

Registered: 01/29/02
Posts: 5
Loc: India
Mr Thiagarajan ,

In my opinion, model a rigid element of length equal to the radius of the header pipe from centre line of Header and define SIF corresponding to "Welding Tee" at centre line of Header. Then define SIF corresponding to "Weldolet" connection at the other end of the rigid element.
_________________________
ashish

Top
#836 - 12/19/02 07:42 PM Re: Sockolet - Modelling
nigel marsh Offline
Member

Registered: 06/21/01
Posts: 25
Loc: Western Australia
If your piping system is to B31.3 then the answer to your question is in Appendix D.

Header pipe sif should be as per "branch weld on fitting", but the branch pipe sif should come from the bottom section of table D-300 than then refers you to note 14.
_________________________
Nigel Marsh

Top
#837 - 08/09/03 02:57 AM Re: Sockolet - Modelling
Amit Offline
Member

Registered: 03/25/03
Posts: 8
Loc: Mumbai
All above information of Modelling of Sockolet is interesting, but I am expecting some answer also from Moderator of this forum.

I have a case of main line as 3" and tapping taken of 2". To follow procedures as describe above would be difficult in this case where 1/2 OD of main line is very less.
_________________________
Amit Paradkar

Top
#74382 - 01/30/20 04:30 AM Re: Sockolet - Modelling [Re: R Thiagarajan]
VGP_592 Offline
Member

Registered: 01/12/18
Posts: 1
Loc: India
Richard,

Please advise on sockolet modeling. Should we define weldolet @ header/branch junction and socket at the end of sockolet or should we just define socket at the center of header/branch intersection in caesar II?

Top
#74387 - 01/30/20 01:10 PM Re: Sockolet - Modelling [Re: VGP_592]
mariog Offline
Member

Registered: 09/29/07
Posts: 798
Loc: Romania

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 36 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)