Topic Options
#74014 - 10/24/19 02:21 AM Seismic anchor motion question
mamak2004 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/20/18
Posts: 5
Loc: South Carolina
For our dynamic analysis (earthquake, spectrum), we applied an enveloped spectra. Later, we decided to include seismic anchor motion by applying a displacement to one anchor node (7630). All other node groups were set to zero displacement.

We compared results between:
a. Enveloped spectra applied to all joints (no seismic anchor motion - anchor movement column left blank)
b. Enveloped spectra + SAM = 8mm at one anchor node
c. Enveloped spectra + SAM = 0.001mm at one anchor node

On a particular portion of the pipeline, the pipe maximum displacement is:
a. 7mm
b. 23mm
c. 19mm

We are curious why displacement of c. is closer to b. than a., even with SAM of only 0.001mm? A little surprised that the ISM method yields different results than the USM method in this case.

Thanks in advance for any insight.




Attachments
sam.jpg




Edited by mamak2004 (10/24/19 02:27 AM)

Top
#74021 - 10/25/19 10:56 AM Re: Seismic anchor motion question [Re: mamak2004]
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6032
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
If you have defined start/stop nodes, then you're actually running ISM, not envelope spectra. If you run ISM and DO NOT define anchor movements then the software will estimate this value and use it.

If omitted, the program estimates this value as the displacement derived from the response spectrum entry corresponding to the lowest frequency. Leaving this value blank does not mean the value is zero.
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay

Top



Moderator:  Dave Diehl, Richard Ay 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 18 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
July
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
11767 Members
14 Forums
16266 Topics
72735 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)
Vanman 19
SaturnV 11
Richard Ay 7
jwood 6
Matt.Worland 5