To answer only to the first part of your query, 5.10.6.2 is a part of 5.10.6 Self-Supporting Dome and Umbrella Roofs. By API 650 definition, a self-supporting dome roof is a roof formed to approximately a spherical surface that is supported only at its periphery. I would consider that having structural elements welded to roof plates (the plates and structurals supported only at roof periphery) does not make the roof as self-supported (for me the "spherical surface" is structural supported and the structural assembly is self-supported), however you need to clarify this aspect with your Client.
I would add that by note under the title of 5.10.6 (
NOTE Self-supporting roofs whose roof plates are stiffened by sections welded to the plates need not conform to the minimum thickness requirements, but the thickness of the roof plates shall not be less than 4.8 mm (3/16 in.) when so designed by the Manufacturer, subject to the approval of the Purchaser.) it seems that the committee tried to make a difference between constructive aspects, but strictly speaking, they don't mentioned in note the area required can be excepted.
As for the differences between the various paragraphs requirements as you've mentioned, it is worth to say that basically both formulas start by considering the failure pressure of a membrane- roof which is
pf=8*Fy*A*tanθ/D^2 - units in [Pa]
5.10.6 considers a safety factor of 0.6 vs pf and gives 5.10.6.2 formula.
Appendix F started by recognizing that the gravity helps and considered DLR; in that section pf is rather:
pf=8*Fy*A*tanθ/D^2+4/PI*DLR/D^2 - units in [Pa]
and in other section of Appendix F it appears that they considered a factor of 1/1.6 for the term containing pressure (1/1.6 is 0.625, close enough to 0.6).
I tried to explain the math derivation in an old post,
http://65.57.255.42/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=44909#Post44909Anyway the above is just giving you some guidance to understand why the 5.10.6.2 is more conservative than Appendix F when consider the area requirements. In my opinion is more related to the history of API 650 development- what various committees considered in a particular moment.
As a conclusion, my advice is to clarify better with your Client the degree of understanding of "self-supported roof" wording.