Topic Options
#64986 - 12/02/15 10:28 AM Seismic Design Code: G loading
wailunwu Offline
Member

Registered: 11/26/15
Posts: 1
Loc: Canada
Hi

I have a vertical vessel with lug supports. Client asked for NBC2010 design code but I received the following warning when using NBC2010 Seismic Design Code:

"Warning: This is a vertical vessel on support lugs and the earthquake type selected is a building code. Building codes assume all of the mass is located above the point of support. This makes their use on lug supported vessels questionable. It is strongly suggested that based on the seismic zone and applicable parameters, an appropriate lateral (Gx) and (+-) vertical (Gy) acceleration be applied using the G loading option."

By changing the Seismic Design code to G-loading option, it requires me to enter directional accelerations (Longitudinal Gx, Lateral Gz, Vertical acceleration Gy). I believe I have to use the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) value given in NBC2010 but am not 100% sure on how to convert it to the directional acclerations as required by the G-loading option. Any advise?
_________________________
Al

Top
#65053 - 12/11/15 05:34 AM Re: Seismic Design Code: G loading [Re: wailunwu]
mariog Offline
Member

Registered: 09/29/07
Posts: 798
Loc: Romania
The warning you received says that some formulas may be no usable since a building code assumes that the stories weight are (more or less equally) distributed over the building height.

I'm not familiar with NBC 2010. A reasonable approach would be to find out the period of the first mode of vibration (T1) and to look into the seismic spectrum which is the corresponding spectral acceleration. The idea is that a rigid body (T=0) on soil will feel the PGA, a vertical vessel with period T1 can be assumed to be subject to an increased acceleration as the spectrum shows. In fact this is not fully-true, theoretically all the modal responses of vessel will be involved in a seismic event.
There are Codes asking to assume that a non-structural component (as the vessel is in relation with a building) is subject to the maximum acceleration of the spectrum (it may be 2.5 to 3.0 times PGA) regardless T1 (in fact, this assumption means that T1, T2, T3, .... all will fall in the maximum values zone of the spectrum). Also, depending on the Code, it may be required to make a more accurate analysis considering more periods of vibrations (T1, T2, T3, ....etc) by effectively introducing the seismic spectrum.
Another issue may be the "ductility" involved or not in a seismic event. In fact is about the capacity to develop "plastic hinges" that will dissipate the seismic energy. If yes, a coefficient shall be considered in a denominator, if no- the spectrum is told to be "elastic" because the legs are supposed to remain into elastic domain of stress-strain, case in which their section must be increased.

Referring your query: you may consider the equivalent static x*PGA in X direction, Y dir, 0.7X and 0.7Y (45 degree, lets say), alone or together with a vertical component, as separate scenarios or combined by SRSS, etc.

Top
#65054 - 12/11/15 07:20 AM Re: Seismic Design Code: G loading [Re: wailunwu]
Ray_Delaforce Offline
Member

Registered: 01/02/03
Posts: 743
Loc: Houston, TX
Hello wailunwu

As stated, the seismic codes are really building codes where building are firmly attached to the ground at the base of the structure. In the case of a vessel mounted upon a skirt, a building code is appropriate. However, in the case of a lug supported vessel, there is little guidance - from the building codes. That is why PV Elite suggest the G loading method be used.
_________________________
Sincerely,
Ray Delaforce
CADWorx & Analysis Solutions
Hexagon PPM

Top



Who's Online
0 registered (), 34 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)