Dear Mr.Mayank,
UG-98(b) says determination of MAWP of a VESSEL PART, in corroded condition and in the presence of worst combination of UG-22 loadings.
when i am determining MAWP as per above definition of a cylinder (lets say of some height) , MAWP will be at the bottom most point.
Now UG-98(a) is intertested in determination of MAWP of complete VESSEL and by that definition MAWP of top most point is determined.
now lets say there is a dish at the top and lets us consider it is having a lesser MAWP than the cylinder MAWP.
even after subtracting the static head of cylinder the DISH MAWP is still less than that of pressure at cylinder top. Since we dont want to overstress the dish, in this
simplest case TOP DISH MAWP may be the deciding factor for VESSEL's MAWP.
Now in your statement you are mentioning MAWP and MAP are same with some conditions.
Please refer below link for more information on why hydrotest based on MAWP and MAP will never be same.
http://www.onetb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3495 Also as per Appendix-3 definition of calculated test pressure we get MAP of the each vessel part by using design formulas. the various cases for MAP determination are mentioned in above link.
Also as per definition of MAP, we get the maximum working pressure in new condition that is including corrosion allowances.
Regards
ASD23789