Topic Options
#54385 - 05/12/13 08:51 AM Load cases in FPSO calculation
pooria1978 Offline
Member

Registered: 02/25/08
Posts: 264
Loc: Netherlands

I am on a calculation in a FPSO and I am a first timer. I am a bit perplexed on how to combine the structure deflections due to the ship motion with the motion accelerations. could anyone confirm the following load cases ( suppose there is only one P/T and U and D represent acceleration and deflection respectively)

L1 W+P+T
L2 W+P+T+U+D
L3 W+P
L4 L2-L1
L5 L3+L4 (scalar) this case would have to be checked for fatigue as well.

if the above load cases are sound, I would like to know why I had to combine displacement with acceleration and check them as an occasional case. as far as I know displacement is always a secondary load, right?

Top
#54386 - 05/12/13 09:15 AM Re: Load cases in FPSO calculation [Re: pooria1978]
danb Offline
Member

Registered: 04/22/05
Posts: 1453
Loc: ...
DNV RP D101 is a very good document.

Regards,
_________________________
Dan

Top
#54388 - 05/12/13 11:31 AM Re: Load cases in FPSO calculation [Re: pooria1978]
pooria1978 Offline
Member

Registered: 02/25/08
Posts: 264
Loc: Netherlands

Dan,

thanks for your tip, I think we had the same conversation a while back when I had just started this project; there I had refered to some of the load cases given in APpendix G of DNV D101 and I had been suggested by you or some other chap that the Appendix G was just an `example`. anyway my profound question is , would it be ok to consider the acceleration plus SUS as an occasional case while the deflection due to the acceleration was included in a secondary load case?

cheers

Top
#54389 - 05/12/13 01:01 PM Re: Load cases in FPSO calculation [Re: pooria1978]
danb Offline
Member

Registered: 04/22/05
Posts: 1453
Loc: ...
In this case, you know my opinion. The main difficulty is to segregate the effects. This is why some people will use the linear approach. In this case you do not have problems in identifying the type of loads. But you have the other problems (e.g. you can not use gaps, friction and so on)

The other approach is not to consider accelerations and displacements simultaneous. In fact the combined effect of accelerations and displacements, having the same direction, it will not be conservative.

Considering one at the time will allow you to construct proper loadcases.

Your loadcase L4 and L5 contain D so can not be a pure OCC.

Regards,
_________________________
Dan

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 42 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)