Topic Options
#50295 - 08/16/12 06:48 PM Interpolation for UTS 80–115 ksi fatigue curve
as-syabab Offline
Member

Registered: 07/20/08
Posts: 14
Loc: The Straits of Malacca
Good morning fellow stressers (it's morning in my place anyways),

This might be a silly question, but hey its morning...most of my brain haven't woken up yet.

I was just wondering, for Carbon, low alloy, series 4xx, high alloy steels and High tensile steels, ASME VII Div.II (and Caesar of course) provides fatigue curves for UTS ≤ 80 ksi & UTS 115–130 ksi. So, how do you interpolate for UTS 80–115 ksi as mentioned is ASME? Does anybody have ever done this before?

Thanks for reading & comments (if any) wink.


Edited by as-syabab (08/16/12 06:49 PM)

Top
#50805 - 09/13/12 10:19 AM Re: Interpolation for UTS 80–115 ksi fatigue curve [Re: as-syabab]
Michael_Fletcher Offline
Member

Registered: 01/29/10
Posts: 1025
Loc: Louisiana, US
While not an exact answer to your question, I have been in this position before, and I opted to use the more conservative curve, rather than assume linear interpolation is indicative of the lifetime reduction effect from cycling the piping.

Top
#50814 - 09/14/12 01:00 AM Re: Interpolation for UTS 80–115 ksi fatigue curve [Re: as-syabab]
PRADEEPD Offline
Member

Registered: 09/27/11
Posts: 76
Loc: INDIA
I observed less allowable stress for no. of cycles in PD5500 curves compared to ASME VIII curves. Roghly 35 to 40% difference. How's that for same material? Which one is more reliable ! This is sligly off track to main question but has relavance.

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 33 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)