Hi Richard & Brittlespring,
Richard - Thanks for the spreadsheet and model in the zip file. It is a good example of a verification we should all do.
I extended the model and calculation to include 10 cases altogether with beam lengths between 1 to 10 feet. The issue that Brittlespring talks about shows up in short beams.
I extended the calculation to include the effect of shear deformations. "Mechanics of Materials" from Timoshenko & Gere is a good reference for this. I tried to do my best to include references for the inevitable questions.
I just did the calc, and I don't want to offer too much interpretation of the results, other than to say that it looks like Caesar does account for shear deformations (beyond basic Euler-Bernoulli calcs.) This is a good thing, and I now have full confidence in how Caesar handles short beams.
Richard - Please review the attachments. I based them on the files you had, but I have been known to make sloppy mistakes. I appreciate your opinion, especially if you can find out the exact terms used in the Caesar stiffness matrix.
RAC
(I can't attach excel files, so I printed my "cantilever_10 cases" spreadsheet as a PDF. I think the PDF is documented enough that anyone could recreate the results.)
Attachments
cantilever_10 cases.pdf (435 downloads)CANTILEVER_10 CASES.C2 (312 downloads)