Topic Options
#42713 - 04/29/11 02:01 AM WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head
Nalibsyah Offline
Member

Registered: 01/24/11
Posts: 59
Loc: Abu Dhabi
Dear All,

I have this problem in one of our project where we have a tower haed nozzle connection to piping that have to be analyze for Local Stress.
And WRC 107 & 297 in CAESAR II can't do this because the centerl line between tower/vessel and nozzle Can't be Colinnier.
So we do with FE-Pipe to get the flexibility then input this flex to CAESAR II.
My question, is there any reason why CAESAR II can't do that. I have read in the CAESAR II help if the case is like this the we must make the vessel nozzle perpendicular to the nozzle centre line? how come this can be achived?

Thanks

Top
#42714 - 04/29/11 02:20 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: Nalibsyah]
stressguy81 Offline
Member

Registered: 07/03/08
Posts: 71
Loc: India
Hi,
You have to read WRC 107/297 for that.

Even when you have a top nozzle on head of a column etc, calculations are performed by converting ellipsoidal head to equivalent sphere and considering nozzle as radial to sphere.
This is the option/general practice followed.

CAESAR II just implements WRC 107/297 that and make our job easier.

Top
#42716 - 04/29/11 06:17 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: stressguy81]
Nalibsyah Offline
Member

Registered: 01/24/11
Posts: 59
Loc: Abu Dhabi
Hi too stressguy,
In which part have mentioned it???
If you follow WRC107 rules in CAESAR II modelling the nozzle vector should pointed to vessel centerline axes, in this case (vertical nozzle on vessel head) should be modeled as horizontal modeled???? how can you do that?
For me its more safer to use FEA software to get the flexibility and SIF and input it back to CAESAR II.
COADE has write this in their mechanical Engineering News August 1992.
So Richard or Dave, what is your comment?

Top
#42718 - 04/29/11 07:06 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: Nalibsyah]
stressguy81 Offline
Member

Registered: 07/03/08
Posts: 71
Loc: India
Hi again,

Quote:
if the case is like this the we must make the vessel nozzle perpendicular to the nozzle centre line? how come this can be achived?


My earlier answer was to this question, which I have represented in "CASE I" of the attached pdf.
"CASE I" is an approximate method of doing, when roof nozzle centre line and column centre line matches.


Even in Case I, the calculation will be approximate and one of coade write up explain this methodlogy. Im not aware if CAESAR II does it automatically, but you can always convert it into equivalent sphere.

Quote:
For me its more safer to use FEA software to get the flexibility and SIF and input it back to CAESAR II.


FEA is obviously a better choice.


Quote:
is there any reason why CAESAR II can't do that


Do refer WRC 107/297, CAESAR II is just a tool.


Experts opinion are welcome.


Attachments
WRC and NOZZLE.pdf (1556 downloads)


Top
#42723 - 04/30/11 10:21 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: stressguy81]
Nalibsyah Offline
Member

Registered: 01/24/11
Posts: 59
Loc: Abu Dhabi
Ok, then you mean by considered it as spherical as in WRC 107 then the Vessel centerline can be assumed as in X or z direction, meanwhile nozzle still in Y direction.
Thanks, for the explanation, but still using FEA is the best way in our opinion in this case. Btw i agree with you CAESAR II is only Tool.
Thank you very much.

Top
#42724 - 04/30/11 11:11 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: Nalibsyah]
Nalibsyah Offline
Member

Registered: 01/24/11
Posts: 59
Loc: Abu Dhabi
Maybe Richard can little bit explain the words in the help facilty :
Quote:
"If they are in the case of Nozzle in the head, The vessel direction vector should be change so that it is perpendicular to the Nozzle direction"

Meanwhile in one of the CAESAR II Topic for the almost the same topic Richard Ay said that:

Quote:
#42543 - 04/20/11 11:56 AM Re: WRC 297 [Re: sillyman]
Richard Ay
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 3811
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
WRC297 addresses cylinder-cylinder intersections. Cylinder-head is not addressed.
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay
Intergraph CAS



Top
#42725 - 04/30/11 11:27 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: Nalibsyah]
Nalibsyah Offline
Member

Registered: 01/24/11
Posts: 59
Loc: Abu Dhabi
I think what Stressguy81 mentioned is WRC 107, and Ricahrd answer for that is for WRC 297, so it is clear now that the intrepretation for CAESAR II help facilty Quote above is for WRC 107 we can considered the vertical vessel as spherical as in Case 1 that stressguy81 give and as in WRC 107, so that the cosie directional can be orthogonal, but for WRC 297 i think it can't be applied since it only for Cylinder-cylinder intersections, so for this case there is to option:
1. Considered itas spherical and do the WRC 107 analysis in CAESAR II.
2. Or you can use FE Pipe to get the flexibility and input it back to CAESAR II.
Thanks.

Top
#42726 - 04/30/11 11:42 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: Nalibsyah]
Nalibsyah Offline
Member

Registered: 01/24/11
Posts: 59
Loc: Abu Dhabi
3. Another methosd to analyze this case in CAESAR II is by using PD5500 nozzle modelling.

Still the easy and accurate for this case from three above method is the second method.
Thanks

Top
#42727 - 04/30/11 12:11 PM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: Nalibsyah]
Tengku_Syahdilan Offline
Member

Registered: 12/26/09
Posts: 56
Loc: Indonesia
Dear Nalibsyah,

I think for head or bottom vessel nozzle, method ass stressguy81 mentioned can't be applied both for WRC 107 and WRC 297. There has been several same question about this if you use the search button....(i'm sorry i don't understand how the way to refer the thread to you :)).
So i thin for this Head or Bottom vessel nozzle, better to use FEA software to get the flexibility and you can input it back to CAESAR II or you can use PD5500 nozzle modelling as you mentioned above in your method 2 and 3....(but for quotion PD 5500 will give you very conservative result, it is better you to read and undertand it first).
Meanwhile for hillside nozzle as Case 3 in stress guy attachment, you can still modelling it in CAESAR II and insert WRC 297 flexibilities.

Thanks

Tengku Syahdilan



Edited by Tengku_Syahdilan (04/30/11 12:17 PM)
_________________________
Tengku_Syahdilan
"From Failure we Learn"

Top
#42728 - 05/01/11 07:18 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: Tengku_Syahdilan]
stressguy81 Offline
Member

Registered: 07/03/08
Posts: 71
Loc: India

Top
#42729 - 05/01/11 09:11 AM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: stressguy81]
stressguy81 Offline
Member

Registered: 07/03/08
Posts: 71
Loc: India

Top
#42731 - 05/01/11 08:45 PM Re: WRC 107/297 for Nozzle at Tower Head [Re: stressguy81]
Nalibsyah Offline
Member

Registered: 01/24/11
Posts: 59
Loc: Abu Dhabi
ok thank you very much stressguy and Tengku.

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 60 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)