Topic Options
#3893 - 09/27/05 11:04 PM Hot Sustained Stress
pornlert_wana Offline
Member

Registered: 04/08/05
Posts: 11
Hi all
I have some question for hot sustained stress that How can I reduce or minimise the Hot Sustain Stress? Please explain the concept for me.. confused

Best Regards
PW
_________________________
[/I]Pornlert W.

Top
#3894 - 09/28/05 01:32 AM Re: Hot Sustained Stress
RS Offline
Member

Registered: 09/15/04
Posts: 81
Loc: South Africa, Johannesburg
You can do search on lift-off and sustained stress on this forum for more answers.
In short, high hot sustained stress (if cold sustained stress is within acceptable limits) is caused by pipe lifting of the supports when hot. Solution is either to relocate supports or to add spring type of supports at locations where pipe is lifting off.
_________________________
Regards
Ranka

Top
#3895 - 09/28/05 01:42 AM Re: Hot Sustained Stress
anindya stress Offline
Member

Registered: 04/12/04
Posts: 493
Loc: London, UK
The code does not tell specifically what has to be considered to calculate and check the redistributed sustained stress due to non activeness of some supports in operating condition, an issue popularly known as "hot sustained stress". This stress can be checked accurately in the computerized analysis by using the concept of non-linear supports. But there is always a question on the allowable. Hot-sustained stress has got the characteristic of both primary and secondary stresses ( that is what I feel). Primary because it is a dead weight redistribution effect. Secondary because it is related to temperature and will be back to the original value when the pipe sits back after the thermal cycle. There is a school of thought that if the pipe sags under the wt.and falls back it is a case of self limitation (perhaps on this line of thought the French Petrochemical code ,I presume CODE T1 qualifies this as a secondary stress). Such a case is possible only if the lift off is small and stresses are in the elastic regime. A higher lift off and the resulting sag should be a case of plastic deformation and hence cannot make the stress redistribution justify it as self-limiting.
2004 edition of B31.3 addresses this issue indirectly in the Appendix P by consideration of "operating stress check" .In my a opinion the code committee should come out with more specific information on this question. Maybe a sustained stress check with an allowable of 1.33Sh (to keep these stresses within yield point and not allow a limit load type of failure) can be considered.This again is my personal opinion only. 1.33Sh is to keep the computed stresses within yield point.

Regards
_________________________
anindya

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 40 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)