#3725 - 09/13/05 02:54 AM
Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 08/29/05
Posts: 101
Loc: China
|
Dear all, In dynamic analyis->control paramenters->static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
after refer the F1 help,i still don't know which load case should be choosed ?
my load case: 4)WW+HP+H(HYD) 5)W+D1+T1+P1+H(OPE) 6)W+D2+T2+P1+H(OPE) 7)W+D3+T3+P1+H(OPE) 8)W+P1+H(SUS) 9)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1(OPE) seismic 10)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U2(OPE) seismic
which one should be choosed, and what is the choose criterion? thanks
Best Regards,
_________________________
whmwhm
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3726 - 09/13/05 03:21 AM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 12/16/99
Posts: 246
Loc: Mannheim,Germany
|
The answer is.. which restraint status of the pipe you will choose for the dynamic analyses. Caesar can not make a dynamic analysis with nonlinear restraints.
Seismic loads give primary stress. Why do you combination with secondary loads ? This combination that you choose ist only for the stress in the support necessary. An here load Case "HS" "Mean(H) und special(S) loads".
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3727 - 09/13/05 03:36 AM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 08/29/05
Posts: 101
Loc: China
|
i am sorry ,i can't know your meaning clearly.maybe my english is a little bit poor.
4)WW+HP+H(HYD) 5)W+D1+T1+P1+H(OPE) 6)W+D2+T2+P1+H(OPE) 7)W+D3+T3+P1+H(OPE) 8)W+P1+H(SUS) 9)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1(OPE) seismic 10)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U2(OPE) seismic
are part of my static load case. and In dynamic analyis->control paramenters->static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
CII let me choose one from the above 7 case. i use dynamic analysis for steam hammer not earthquick ,because earthquick was analysised in static method by input g's value,not dynamic mothod
hope you can know what i mean,thank you!
_________________________
whmwhm
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3728 - 09/13/05 03:39 AM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 08/29/05
Posts: 101
Loc: China
|
Oh, i got it ,do you mean that my static load case : 9)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1(OPE) seismic 10)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U2(OPE) seismic
are not correct?
_________________________
whmwhm
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3729 - 09/13/05 06:40 AM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 12/16/99
Posts: 246
Loc: Mannheim,Germany
|
Tha load D1 (steam hammer) and the load U (static seismic) must not be combination !
Your load case for the primäry stress must be W+D1+P1+H (OCC)and a another load case.. W+P1+H+U (OCC). Dynamic loads which effect "short time" are not (OPE). Dynamic combination with T1 you need only for the "support stress calculation" (here load case HS). Best Regards..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3730 - 09/13/05 07:52 AM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
|
D1 from the static load sets refers to "displacement set one" not "dynamic case one".
Use all load cases associated with the hammer event. My guess is that it will be either 5, 6 and/or 7. If the nonlinear support configuration does not change between 5, 6 & 7 then use any one. If the supports' actions change (active to inactive) between these cases, I would probably run a few of them to see what's the worst and use that.
I agree that the static seismic analyses (9 & 10) above would be appropriate for calculating a structural response (notice I didn't say "the" structural response) to the seismic event while the system is in operation. (Other cases would include "W+D1+T1+P1+H-U1", etc.) It is not, however, a proper check of code-defined occasional stresses.
_________________________
Dave Diehl
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3731 - 09/13/05 06:30 PM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 08/29/05
Posts: 101
Loc: China
|
Dear Dave,
yes, i only list part of my static load case, a complete one are:
.....(hanger case) 4)WW+HP+H(HYD) 5)W+D1+T1+P1+H(OPE) T1=566.6^c OPE TEMP 6)W+D2+T2+P1+H(OPE) T2=0^C START UP TEMP 7)W+D3+T3+P1+H(OPE) T3=574^c DESIGN TEMP 8)W+P1+H(SUS) 9)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1(OPE) seismic FOR NOZZLE RESTRAINTS IN SEISMIC U1 10)W+D1+T1+P1+H+U2(OPE) seismic ... 11)W+D1+T1+P1+H-U1(OPE) seismic ... 12)W+D1+T1+P1+H-U2(OPE) seismic ... 13)L5-L8(EXP) 14)L6-L8(EXP) 15)L7-L8(EXP) 16)L9-L5 (occ) algebraic 17)L10-L5 (occ) algebraic 18)L11-L5 (occ) algebraic 19)L12-L5 (occ) algebraic 20)L16+L8 (occ) scalar FOR SEISMIC U1 STRESS 21)L17+L8 (occ) scalar ... 22)L18+L8 (occ) scalar ... 23)L19+L8 (occ) scalar ...
do you think the above load case is complete for seismic?
then,in dynamic analysis, I combine D1(steam hammer ,not the D1 in static) with L8 for steam hammer stress, but if i want to check the nozzle restraints to see if they are exceed limits when the hammer occur in 566.6^C when the valve sudden shut down, i don't know how to do. i combine D1 with L5 to see nozzle restraints, does it right?
other question,"I would probably run a few of them to see what's the worst and use that." what is the "worst" mean?
BEST REGARDS,
_________________________
whmwhm
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3732 - 09/14/05 08:14 AM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
|
Yes, I believe you have address seismic load evaluation with the load cases you list.
With the large number of load cases you may want to use some of the other load case "combinations" to simplify review. For example, add L24=L20,L21,L22,L23 (display stress only, listing the MAXIMUM value from these load cases).
In dynamics, yes, sum D1 and S8 to review these hammer stresses.
For the hammer reactions I would review S5 plus D1 and S5 minus D1 but CAESAR II will lose all signs in these combinations so you'll have to do this outside of CAESAR II.
"Worst" - calculate the natural frequencies based on the restraint configuration (from either L5, L6 or L7) that produces the highest loads or stresses.
_________________________
Dave Diehl
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3733 - 09/14/05 06:18 PM
Re: Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint status
|
Member
Registered: 08/29/05
Posts: 101
Loc: China
|
Here ,
I should thank Ohliger and Dave,
I really appreciate your time!
Thank you!
Best Regards!
_________________________
whmwhm
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
42
Guests and
0
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts
Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
|
|
|