When the user choose rigid element and give the weight = 0 and not empty field, then the warning
18E "RIGID WEIGHT has not specified ...Zero assumed" is superfluous i mean.

When the user choose rigid (Valve) with geometric intersection then the warning
33E " There is a GEOMETRIC INTERSECTION at node x
and there was NO user defined INTERSECTION TYPE...." is also superfluous.

For a middle pipe system i have 5 pages warning this type.

Can you change this ?
If rigid weight not empty no warning 18E.
If rigid then not warning 33E.

We'll take a look at these warnings. Number 18 will be hard to remove, since many of the CAD interfaces transfer valves without any weight data, so the value in the neutral file is zero. You would want the warning in this case.

At the moment, I don't see anything wrong with "not showing" 33E if one of the elements is rigid.

Richard,

I appreciate all the warnings for the instances were my model deviates from the norm. Manytimes the coding was intentional but sometimes it exposes and error or omission.

Keep up the good work!

Too many??? Or not enough??? Always a tough call, and to some extent based on personal choice and personal attentiveness to detail.

Make a printout of the warnings the 1st time you run the model, review and annotate them, keep it for your records and finally review it against a "final" printout when your done.

Warnings that were easily dismissed can be easily dismissed again and you may find somehting new!

P.S. use a text comparator program if you would like too... I prefer paper.