Topic Options
#20654 - 09/11/08 05:06 AM Rotational Masses
Rickl Offline
Member

Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 3
Loc: Germany, Mannheim

I have a problem to calculate the natural frequencies for a rigid frame founded on springs by using the dynamic module of Caesar.

Running the dynamic analysis with activated translational and rotational masses it always leads to very low natural frequencies far below 1Hz. I can`t find any mistake in my Caesar input file.

I did a calculation of the natural frequencies by myself and it leads to reliable results showing natural frequencies starting from 3 Hz (see attached *.pdf)

May there be any internal mistake in Caesar when the units are defined, which causes too low frequencies?

I attached the Hand-calculation and the Caesar input-file. Maybe you could help me

Best Regards,

Rick


Attachments
430-NURKOMPRESSOR.C2 (372 downloads)
431-Scan.PDF (504 downloads)


Top
#20668 - 09/11/08 10:30 AM Re: Rotational Masses [Re: Rickl]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
Our default, lumped mass approach does not include rotational inertia in the mass model. You have rotational inertial defined in your input. To properly apply that mass, you must specify CONSISTENT mass rather than LUMPED mass in the Control Parameters.

You can check how CAESAR II places mass by reviewing the Included Mass Data report.
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 55 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)