Topic Options
#19707 - 08/04/08 04:53 AM Vertical displacements aren't logic
Italtecnica Offline
Member

Registered: 06/26/08
Posts: 28
Loc: Italy
Hi to everybody!

I've a strange problem.I'll try to explain it in the best way.

I consider a 30inches line, 10-S schedule (7.92mm), 150RF.
You find attacched an example below:



At node 10 there's an equipement connection; at node 1000 there's a vertical restraint which sustains a flare starting after node 130.

This line has -163°C as operating temperature and 10 barg as design pressure.

At node 10 there's a thermal displacement in Z: -12.5 mm

I've considered two case:
1) at node 10 only thermal displacement in Z and null displacement inZ at node 1000
2) at node 10 a +233 mm displacement in Z (I've alredy deducted thermal displacemet) and +245.56mm displacement in Z at node 1000

I think that relative displacement among other nodes should be the same in two cases considered above.
Analysing simulation I find different values:
- between node 30 and 58 there's 9.411mm displacement in the first case while 12.763mm in the second case.
- between node 80 and 128 there's 10.894mm displacement in the first case while 8.305mm in the second case.

Why displacements are different? Why the two deflections aren't the same?
I hope somebody can help me.


Regards

Top
#19738 - 08/05/08 02:37 AM Re: Vertical displacements aren't logic [Re: Italtecnica]
Italtecnica Offline
Member

Registered: 06/26/08
Posts: 28
Loc: Italy
Is there anyone which can help me?

Nobody think of this situation is strange or not? If somebody think of it is correct,he can explain me his reasons?


Top
#19750 - 08/05/08 07:41 AM Re: Vertical displacements aren't logic [Re: Italtecnica]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
What happens after node 130? The stiffness of the rest of the system would account for a change in the displacement response between 10 and 130.

If all the other vertical (Z) restraints see the same displacements as 1000, I would expect to see the same displacement pattern between 10 and 130.

Nice graphic.
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top
#19770 - 08/06/08 12:14 AM Re: Vertical displacements aren't logic [Re: Dave Diehl]
Italtecnica Offline
Member

Registered: 06/26/08
Posts: 28
Loc: Italy
After node 130 there's a cold vent which has lateral guides from the base to the top.
The cold vent, having a vertical restraint at node 130 and lateral guides along its development, doesn't affect the rest of the system beetwen node 10 and node 128.
So,considering a displacement of +233mm (in Z axis) at node 10 and a displacement of +245.56mm at node 1000, I expect the system has the same deflection in the case we consider displacement of -12.5 mm (in Z axis) at node 10 and a displacement of 0 mm at node 1000.
In the two case considered, the relative displacement is the same.
(233-245.5=-12.5mm)
So, in all nodes considered I expect to see the same displacement in both cases.
For example: with displacements of 233 and 245.5 mm, if node 79 has a displacement of -5 mm (Z axis), also in the system having displacements of -12.5 and 0 mm I expect to see at node 79 a displacement of -5mm.
Are you agree with me?

Regards

Top
#19782 - 08/06/08 09:53 AM Re: Vertical displacements aren't logic [Re: Italtecnica]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
If the system is linear and if ALL vertical boundary conditions have the same RELATIVE movements, then, yes, I agree.

Apparently, your system does not meet these criteria.

May I see your model?
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top
#19834 - 08/08/08 06:52 AM Re: Vertical displacements aren't logic [Re: Dave Diehl]
Italtecnica Offline
Member

Registered: 06/26/08
Posts: 28
Loc: Italy
You find attacched below links to download my model.

to download model with displacements copy this link:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/xbd3x6


to download model without displacements copy this link:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/8ocfxe

I hope you will give me an answer.
Thanks

Regards

Top
#19836 - 08/08/08 07:47 AM Re: Vertical displacements aren't logic [Re: Italtecnica]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
I believe the difference lies in the nonlinear restraints. What happens if you remove friction at the 1000/1001 support in Z?

I notic in your restraint report that the "with" job loads node 1000 in Y (Z is up) while the "eithout" job pushes in X.
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top
#19844 - 08/08/08 09:30 AM Re: Vertical displacements aren't logic [Re: Dave Diehl]
Italtecnica Offline
Member

Registered: 06/26/08
Posts: 28
Loc: Italy
Yes! It's right! the different displacements depends on nonlinear restraints.
I removed friction at the 1000/1001 support in Z and I notice in both cases displacements are the same.

Thanks a lot

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 23 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)