Topic Options
#17810 - 05/06/08 09:29 PM Restraint Report Interpretation
riz_john Offline
Member

Registered: 01/06/08
Posts: 20
Loc: Abu Dhabi, UAE
hello. gud morning to all.......sorry to ask this dumb question. im just new to caesar.

i did a stress analysis for a burried piping and here is the report;

RESTR REPORT: Loads on Restraints
CASE 1 (OPE) W+T1+P1

NODE Fx Fy Fz Resu.Force Mx My Mz Resu.Moment Restraint Type
lb lb lb lb ftlb ftlb ftlb ftlb

100 -1097 14 7254 737 0 0 0 0 Bi-linear X2
100 522 0 79 528 0 0 0 0 Bi-linear X2
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bi-linear X2

The questions are:
Why there are three nodes reflected in the reports. What are these forces?

I also noticed that the resultant forces are always positive eventhough there are negative forces.


Hope you could help me with this, many thanks.

Top
#17813 - 05/06/08 09:51 PM Re: Restraint Report Interpretation [Re: riz_john]
Sam Manik Offline
Member

Registered: 04/02/08
Posts: 231
Loc: Jakarta, Indonesia
Dear John,

Did you mean?

100 -1097 14 7254 737 0 0 0 0 Bi-linear X2
100 522 0 79 528 0 0 0 0 Bi-linear Y2
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bi-linear Z2

If yes, please note that "restrains report" list all reaction for every single type of restrain. you have three type of support in buried by soil regarding to your model. That's why you have three row report.

But "restrain summary report" list the reaction at node in one row and sum each direction X, Y, Z. Please try by using "restrain summary" in report options for comparison.


Edited by Samsul P. Manik (05/06/08 09:57 PM)
_________________________
Many thanks & regards,
Sam Manik

Top
#17814 - 05/06/08 09:57 PM Re: Restraint Report Interpretation [Re: Sam Manik]
riz_john Offline
Member

Registered: 01/06/08
Posts: 20
Loc: Abu Dhabi, UAE
thaks for your quick reply.

But the restraint types are all "BI-LINEAR X2"

Top
#17815 - 05/06/08 10:01 PM Re: Restraint Report Interpretation [Re: riz_john]
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6226
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
If the line is skewed, the restraints are defined with "direction cosines". A label is still necessary for output, and this defaults to the "X" direction.

Go back to the input for node 100 and review how the restraints are defined.
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay - Consultant

Top
#17816 - 05/06/08 10:18 PM Re: Restraint Report Interpretation [Re: Richard Ay]
riz_john Offline
Member

Registered: 01/06/08
Posts: 20
Loc: Abu Dhabi, UAE
when i converted the original model into a burried piping model, all the restraints in the nodes were defined as X2

Top
#17818 - 05/06/08 11:00 PM Re: Restraint Report Interpretation [Re: riz_john]
Sam Manik Offline
Member

Registered: 04/02/08
Posts: 231
Loc: Jakarta, Indonesia
Dear John,

Please take a look to next element, sometimes the restrain of element 100 defined there. Let say in elements 99-100 and 100-101.

Is the format of restrain like?
X2 (.813733, 0, .58123821)
...
...

The restrain by soil are in x, y, z (local) coordinate of element if we see it in plot view. But the restrain report listed in global coordinate. The three row you mentioned are the reaction to global coordinate X, Y, Z from three type restrain.


Edited by Samsul P. Manik (05/06/08 11:04 PM)
_________________________
Many thanks & regards,
Sam Manik

Top
#17821 - 05/06/08 11:27 PM Re: Restraint Report Interpretation [Re: Sam Manik]
riz_john Offline
Member

Registered: 01/06/08
Posts: 20
Loc: Abu Dhabi, UAE
actually my pipeline is skewed.

These are the Restraint type in my burried piping model after i converted it. (NODE 100-101)

X2 (-.14951, .001866, .988756)
X2 (-.98875, 0, -.1495202)
X2 (.000279, .999998, -.00184)


Many thanks.

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 33 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)