Topic Options
#174 - 09/04/00 03:34 PM WRC-107 vs. Elliptical Head
Stuart Lugo Offline
Member

Registered: 09/04/00
Posts: 2
Loc: Punto Fijo, Falcón, Venezuela
I would like to know if it is possible to evaluate a nozzle attached to an elliptical head using WCR-107 or WRC-297.

What values must I omit or change in order to get the best results?

If there is a way I could take, please let me know.

Stuart Lugo

Top
#175 - 09/05/00 01:20 PM Re: WRC-107 vs. Elliptical Head
Scott_Mayeux Offline
Member

Registered: 12/23/99
Posts: 347
Loc: Houston,TX,USA
Dear Sir,

If the nozzle is in the spherical part of the elliptical head, then it should be OK to use WRC 107 to perform the local stress analysis of the junction. You will have to enter in the spherical diameter of the head which is a function of the Aspect Ratio and diameter of the head. See ASME VIII 1 UG-37 for details on computing the spherical diameter. For a 2:1 elliptical head, the spherical diameter would be 1.8 times the head diameter. Enter in the rest of the data as you would for a typical 107 analysis.

Unfortunately, WRC 297 is not applicable for nozzle/spherical junctions. Only cylinder to cylinder intersections are allowed.


------------------
Scott Mayeux
COADE Inc.
_________________________
Scott Mayeux
CADWorx & Analysis Solutions
Intergraph Process, Power, & Marine

Top
#14375 - 11/17/07 06:49 AM Re: WRC-107 vs. Elliptical Head [Re: Scott_Mayeux]
MID Offline
Member

Registered: 10/31/07
Posts: 2
Loc: Korea
Follow up question.

Can anyone provide me details on how to deal with top nozzle on vertical vessels using WRC 107? The report states that the vessel and nozzle centerline should be orthogonal

Please help

Thanks!

Top
#14405 - 11/19/07 01:45 AM Re: WRC-107 vs. Elliptical Head [Re: MID]
Rajinder Singh Offline
Member

Registered: 07/25/06
Posts: 55
Loc: New Delhi
Use PD 5500 for top nozzle on vertical vessels


Edited by Rajinder Singh (11/19/07 02:00 AM)
_________________________
Rajinder

Top
#14406 - 11/19/07 02:13 AM Re: WRC-107 vs. Elliptical Head [Re: Rajinder Singh]
Arijit Offline
Member

Registered: 11/29/02
Posts: 42
Apart from referring UG-37 of Sec.VIII Div.1, there has been numerous discussions of this topic if you search this forum. Richard Ay has suggested another ingenious method for such cases where cylinder to cylinder connection is co-axial/collinear.
I believe such cases can be 'converted' into sphere to cylinder case by equivalent diameter method. In one of the codes there is infact a nice example of such problems. It is unfortunate that I really can't remember it.
PD5500 is also more or less same as EN13445, so even that can be referred.

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 33 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)