I got your means,thanks whm.
As your means,if our earthquake monment result is -200N.m to +200N.m,we can use 200N.m to calculate pipe stress.But another choice is -100N.m to +100N.m as one-half monment range,why not use 100N.m to calculate pipe stress?And why not define one-half the WIND monment range in ASME B31.1?
we use seismic peak acceleration as our input data,not average acceleration,so the 200N.m is base on movement by peak acceleration,so it's double to monment due to actual movement,so the result is too conservative.This is only my means,I sent you a massege,we can discuss this by email more detail.
Edited by Twing (02/15/08 02:48 AM)
_________________________
Regards!
WangXuDong