Topic Options
#13997 - 10/29/07 07:18 AM NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE
Von Offline
Member

Registered: 02/18/06
Posts: 3
Loc: Texas
Could some one let me know why I get this warning
"NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE" only in the OPE
load case. All other cases are seem to be fine.Is
it a Modelling issue or a material database issue ?
Thanks

-Von
_________________________
Vinay

Top
#13999 - 10/29/07 07:31 AM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: Von]
SAMAbdul Offline
Member

Registered: 07/06/05
Posts: 64
Loc: Japan
There are numerous posts on this topic. Pl use the search function!
_________________________
SAMAbdul

Top
#14000 - 10/29/07 07:53 AM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: SAMAbdul]
John C. Luf Offline
Member

Registered: 03/25/02
Posts: 1110
Loc: U.S.A.
Because you have not taken any time to read or try to understand the code your analysis is based upon. READ THE CODE, ACT RESPONSIBLY!
_________________________
Best Regards,

John C. Luf

Top
#14002 - 10/29/07 08:03 AM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: Von]
bom Offline
Member

Registered: 06/23/07
Posts: 285
Loc: Manila, Philippines
Sir,

You will understand their reaction if you browse the forum.. smile

Good day!
_________________________
BOM

Top
#14003 - 10/29/07 08:03 AM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: Von]
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6226
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
The "Sticky Posts" at the top of this forum were made "Sticky" becasue they are important. Read this one.
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay - Consultant

Top
#14088 - 11/01/07 10:42 PM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: Richard Ay]
sha Offline
Member

Registered: 11/01/07
Posts: 45
Loc: India
Can you tell me..why ANSI B31.3 is not checking stress for hydro case
it is checking only sustain and expansion case only.


Top
#14098 - 11/02/07 05:02 AM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: sha]
John C. Luf Offline
Member

Registered: 03/25/02
Posts: 1110
Loc: U.S.A.
sure can you tell me where hydrotest is clearly defined in B31.3 in so far as an allowed stress value is concerned? An I suggest you....

search this forum

and then if you don't find anything (doubtful) and only then repost this question as a new topic. Hint you won't be doing tis after a search


Edited by John C. Luf (11/02/07 05:04 AM)
_________________________
Best Regards,

John C. Luf

Top
#14106 - 11/02/07 08:24 AM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: John C. Luf]
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6226
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
Specify the "Sy" value on the "Allowable Dialog".
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay - Consultant

Top
#14109 - 11/02/07 09:22 AM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: sha]
SAMAbdul Offline
Member

Registered: 07/06/05
Posts: 64
Loc: Japan
Sharuk,

If ur question is why CAESAR II is not checking hydro stresses then Richard has an answer for u...If ur question is why B 31.3 is not checking, then u have to do more homework!
_________________________
SAMAbdul

Top
#14371 - 11/16/07 08:43 PM Re: NO CODE COMPLIANCE CHECK DONE [Re: Von]
machoguy Offline
Member

Registered: 11/16/07
Posts: 25
Loc: Nigeria
I also encountered that warning when I choose operating case with the code compliance. I found out that there is no code compliance, as what I understand code compliance is for sustained and expansion case only. I suggest to read the user's guide.thats all!!!

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 30 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)