Topic Options
#12054 - 07/05/07 02:58 PM Efficiency seam
Pedro Lopes Offline
Member

Registered: 07/01/05
Posts: 2
Loc: Piracicaba, São Paulo - Brazi...
Hi all,
I would like to know if it is possible I use in the same equipment, full radiography only in longitudinal joint and use E = 1 for efficiency of the longitudinal seam (Joint Category A) and E = 0.85 for efficiency of the circumferential seam (Joint Category B)?

Thank you

Pedro
_________________________
Pedro S. Lopes

Top
#12068 - 07/06/07 07:03 AM Re: Efficiency seam [Re: Pedro Lopes]
EJL Offline
Member

Registered: 05/28/07
Posts: 9
Loc: Alberta, Canada
Pedro,

That would be a user defined efficiency in PVElite. Data Plate marking would show RT-4 (others don't apply) and have the details shown in the remarks section of the data report.

EJL

Top
#12116 - 07/10/07 05:22 AM Re: Efficiency seam [Re: EJL]
Pedro Lopes Offline
Member

Registered: 07/01/05
Posts: 2
Loc: Piracicaba, São Paulo - Brazi...
Tanks EJL,

But, according RT-4, I must use E = 0.85 for efficiency of the longitudinal seam in my case, correctly?
According RT-2, if I full radiography the longitudinal joint and spot radiography the circumferential joint, I can use E = 1 for efficiency of the longitudinal seam and E = 1 for efficiency of the circumferential seam too, correctly?
And then, when I can use different efficiency for longitudinal and circumferential joint?

Pedro
_________________________
Pedro S. Lopes

Top
#12118 - 07/10/07 07:03 AM Re: Efficiency seam [Re: Pedro Lopes]
EJL Offline
Member

Registered: 05/28/07
Posts: 9
Loc: Alberta, Canada
Pedro,

This item has always caused confusion. If you fully radiograph per UW-11 (a) the long seam then you will have an efficiency of 1 (for type 1 joint). Without performing any other radiography your circumferential seam efficiency will be 0.7. This is the value to be used in calculating the required shell thickness per UW-27 equation 2. This thickness will seldom govern but is needed for the data report. This will need an RT-4 marking as none of the other markings are applicable. The efficiency of the head (this is really a quality factor) would be 0.85 in accordance with UW-12(d) as you did not do a spot on the circuferential seam to satisfy UW-11(a)5(b).

If you add an extra spot (essentially to achieve a better quality factor for the heads) on the circuferential seam then you would in fact have RT-2. Your circumferential seam efficiency to be marked on the data report would still be 0.7 but then the head efficiency (quality factor) would be 1 in accordance with UW-12(d).

UG-116(e)(4) states that RT-4 is to be used when only part of the vessel satisfies UW-11(a) i.e. the long seam, and when the other markings do not apply.

I hope this makes things a bit clearer.

Regards,
EJL

Top



Who's Online
0 registered (), 27 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)