A SERIOUS TROUBLE IN CAESAR 5.1

hi there,

I need an explanation about a problem found in CAESAR 5.1.

The weight hanger case has been defined as L1=W+P (HGR) instead of L1=W(HGR)CII RECOMMENDATION
and as result we have been noticed a totally different spring hanger design from Caesar between these alternative L1 definitions!

Please advise about the reasons of this result. How the internal pressure can affect the hanger design in Caesar?

Moreover, I need to know if the same thing happens also in Caesar 5.2 & 5.3.

Thank you in advance.
Steves

maybe you have Bourdon effect activated.

regards,

... or maybe an untied expansion joint?