Posted by: Goodsalt
Modeling Heat Exchanger Nozzles - Peng - 05/06/10 05:11 AM
Peng's book discusses modeling heat exchangers thus:
"... the heat exchanger can be modeled as pipe and be directly included in the piping analysis. The stress intensification factor for the fabricated branch connection, reinforced or un-reinforced, can be used to calculate the junction stress."
No problem with the first sentence - that's what we do. However he appears to be saying that the nozzle/exchanger interface can be modelled as a tee.
He then goes on to discuss use of allowable loads from the manufacturer which we have and are using. We do this by defining a CNODE anchor at the nozzle flange face and compare the restraint loads reported to the allowables.
My question is: if one were to use the tee approach, if that in fact is what he means, what use are the stresses reported since they are pipe code stresses - seems like a case of apples and oranges.
Of course one could define a nozzle at this point and go through WRC 107 but I'm curious as to the intent and implications of sentence previously quoted.
"... the heat exchanger can be modeled as pipe and be directly included in the piping analysis. The stress intensification factor for the fabricated branch connection, reinforced or un-reinforced, can be used to calculate the junction stress."
No problem with the first sentence - that's what we do. However he appears to be saying that the nozzle/exchanger interface can be modelled as a tee.
He then goes on to discuss use of allowable loads from the manufacturer which we have and are using. We do this by defining a CNODE anchor at the nozzle flange face and compare the restraint loads reported to the allowables.
My question is: if one were to use the tee approach, if that in fact is what he means, what use are the stresses reported since they are pipe code stresses - seems like a case of apples and oranges.
Of course one could define a nozzle at this point and go through WRC 107 but I'm curious as to the intent and implications of sentence previously quoted.