non linear restraint

Posted by: streng

non linear restraint - 10/07/03 11:40 PM

Dear all,

I am a new Caesar user.
i have a simple model which using resting support +Y on it. when i change the support to Y, it has a different result in restraint summary.
During static analysis, which one is more valid, using support type Y or +Y ?
How about the using of Gap for stopper or guide ?
is there any theory regarding this matter ?
your help will be highly appreciated.
thank you.
Posted by: Richard Ay

Re: non linear restraint - 10/08/03 07:12 AM

The fact that you got different results between the system with the "+Y" versus the "Y" is not surprising. A "+Y" is a nonlinear support, it has no stiffness in the "up" direction, while it is rigid in the "down" direction. A "Y" on the other hand is rigid in both the "up" and "down" directions. As soon as you have non-linear supports in your system, the software must iterate for a solution. This does not occur if you system consists of only linear supports.

Quote:
During static analysis, which one is more valid, using support type Y or +Y ?
Neither, they both have their applications. You should use which ever one is or will be actually in the real system in the field.

Quote:
How about the using of Gap for stopper or guide ?
Again, these have their applications. You should use what actually reflects the real system.

Quote:
is there any theory regarding this matter ?
Only experience and company procedures / policies.