Posted by: shk
Number of load cycle to use f=1.2 - 03/26/07 03:35 PM
High friends
We had a case concerning the application of f=1.2 in CAESARII
there are some answers, but non of them is addressing the load cycle N range , from Fig 302.3.5 in ASME B 31.3 (2004) , why is it so???
does it have any effect on f?( seems to have )
regards
shahram
Posted by: Richard Ay
Re: Number of load cycle to use f=1.2 - 03/26/07 03:39 PM
Posted by: shk
Stress combination methods - 03/26/07 03:43 PM
Friends
I need to when we use Algebric or Scaler or any other method to combine the stresses ( load cases) .
Regards
Shahram
Posted by: shk
Re: Stress combination methods - 03/26/07 03:52 PM
Richard
Thanks for your reply
I checked the mentioned case ,you had mentioned the code requirments as followings:
You just can't use f=1.2, there are some checks to be made. The Code allows "f" to go to 1.2 if:
(a) the material is ferrous - CAESAR II can't check this one, you have to
(b) the min tensile strength does not exceed 75 ksi, - CAESAR II can't check this one, you have to
(c) the temperature is less than 700 degF.
If you exceed any of these, "f" is limited to 1.0. CAESAR II can only enforce the temperature limit, so my guess is that your over this
But dose the load cycle has any effect here???
Posted by: Richard Ay
Re: Stress combination methods - 03/26/07 03:59 PM
If you specified the number of cycles (either in the "f" field of the input or on the "Load Case Options" tab of the Load Case Editor), then c2 uses the equation to determine "f".
Posted by: Richard Ay
Re: Stress combination methods - 03/26/07 04:00 PM
In general, "Algebraic" should be used for all combinations except the "OCC" stress summation. There is help text available in the Load Case Editor for this option. See if this is sufficient.
Posted by: Rienzie
Re: Stress combination methods - 01/26/11 07:51 PM
Hi,
What is the rational behind this difference treatment.
Can I get some advice,
Thanks
Lawrence