Posted by: shamaliabhavin
Spring support with hold down (-Y restraint with gap) - 03/03/17 03:33 AM
I am analysing the Stress system having different operating conditions.
Parameters for the same are as follows:
Line Size : 20"
Design / Operating Temperature : 450 / 430 deg C
Fluid : Molten Salt
Fluid density : 1850 kg /m3
I have used Constant spring support (user defined based on sustain weight) to qualify the nozzle loads and stresses.
Hold down support (-Y restraint) with gap also provided along with the spring support for normally no flow condition (when no fluid inside pipe) to overcome stress failure and nozzle load because of high density fluid and large size pipe.
Here in C-II, we have defined constant spring support (user defined) and at same location -Y support with 35 mm gap in upward direction.
Request Intergraph that is this modelling is acceptable or this is not appropriate modelling in CAESAR-II defining spring (user defined) and -Y with gap at same location? Is there loop holes in C-II with this?
Regards,
Shamalia Bhavin
Parameters for the same are as follows:
Line Size : 20"
Design / Operating Temperature : 450 / 430 deg C
Fluid : Molten Salt
Fluid density : 1850 kg /m3
I have used Constant spring support (user defined based on sustain weight) to qualify the nozzle loads and stresses.
Hold down support (-Y restraint) with gap also provided along with the spring support for normally no flow condition (when no fluid inside pipe) to overcome stress failure and nozzle load because of high density fluid and large size pipe.
Here in C-II, we have defined constant spring support (user defined) and at same location -Y support with 35 mm gap in upward direction.
Request Intergraph that is this modelling is acceptable or this is not appropriate modelling in CAESAR-II defining spring (user defined) and -Y with gap at same location? Is there loop holes in C-II with this?
Regards,
Shamalia Bhavin