Topic Options
#7425 - 03/11/06 02:52 AM MAWP...
NADERI Offline
Member

Registered: 12/03/05
Posts: 15
Dear My Freinds,
I will be pleased if anybody answer my question.
Generally we avoid falling MAWP on nozzel instead of shell and flange.
Do we have to do it or is it optional?
Regards,
Naderi
_________________________
M.NADERI

Top
#7426 - 03/13/06 02:06 PM Re: MAWP...
Ray_Delaforce Offline
Member

Registered: 01/02/03
Posts: 743
Loc: Houston, TX
Hello Naderi

I am not quite sure what your question is, but this what I think you mean: Is their a way of ensuring that the nozzle does not limit the MAWP of the vessel. If this is the case, there is a way in PVElite. If you click the 'Load Cases' tab (usually at the bottom of the screen), then go to 'Nozzle Design Pressure Options'. From the drop down box, choose '4 MAWP plus static head to nozzle', and the nozzle will not limit the MAWP of the vessel.
_________________________
Sincerely,
Ray Delaforce
CADWorx & Analysis Solutions
Hexagon PPM

Top
#7427 - 03/15/06 01:24 AM Re: MAWP...
NADERI Offline
Member

Registered: 12/03/05
Posts: 15
Dear Delaforce,
Thank you very much for your attention.
Please let me explain my question again.
In the output of Pvelite, the nozzle summary section, after sumerizing nozzle in a table, Pvelite mentions Min of M.A.W.P for Nozzle and Shell&Flange.
My question is:
Is it crutial that we avoid falling of Min of M.A.W.P on nozzle.
For instance, it is necessary that M.A.W.P of nozzel be greater than M.A.W.P of shell&Flange.
I will appreciate if you let me know your answer.
Best Regards,
Naderi
_________________________
M.NADERI

Top



Who's Online
0 registered (), 35 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)