Vanman,
I probably have misspoke on the Db side of things. I now understand that AutoCAD Plant 3D runs on an integrated Db. Also, you can hear many sides and slants when comparing two software packages due to personal preferences.
My experiences: I have worked with and customized both CADWorx P&ID but only tested the Db side of things so far. Time for testing and customization is very limited here.
Before we switched to CADWorx, I also operated and customized what was an independent software, AutoCAD P&ID, working with the head of development due to lack of in-depth documentation at the time.
With AutoCAD P&ID to this day, you cannot even work with AutoCAD Plant 3D P&ID's without exporting them to 'vanilla'. Even then, the graphics get all out of whack when you do!
At least there is the possibility of editing P&ID's generated by CADWorx P&ID.
So, I must again delve into MS Access and its interaction with CADWorx P&ID Pro to really provide the line lists that most chemical engineers here desire. It is not a pristine, new plant being a century old this year and there are many other issues in which to deal before we get to refining things.
Thanks!
_________________________
Thanks,
Clint Hill