Topic Options
#58082 - 03/12/14 10:05 PM Constant Spring Hanger Design
Naveen_Synergy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/12/14
Posts: 4
Loc: Malaysia
Hi Seniors,

Iam new to Caesar and currently accelerate myself to drive Caesar efficiently. Basically I face some inconsistency after spring hanger designed in Caesar II. The case summarize as below.

Currently attached with a revamp project which requires new piping routing, supports and stress analysis. As to kick start my job I refer previous piping stress report (year 1998)and modelled it into Caesar II to compare the results.

I modelled exactly including constant support load together with load cases establishment.

However my code compliance not able to pass for all the cases.
Sustained and Sustained+Occasional cases are failed.

My concern is why I can get a similar result? Code Compliance failed! Please advise me.

Thank You.

Top
#58083 - 03/12/14 10:24 PM Re: Constant Spring Hanger Design [Re: Naveen_Synergy]
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6226
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
Your job file needs to be reviewed. Open a Support Request on SmartSupport and send in both models for review.
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay - Consultant

Top
#58098 - 03/13/14 08:03 AM Re: Constant Spring Hanger Design [Re: Naveen_Synergy]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
I can't say when the change occurred but spring and constant support pre-loads used to be identified as "F1" (as in W+P1+F1) and now we group those loads in "H" (W+P1+H). Check your load case definitions.
Just a guess.
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top
#58099 - 03/13/14 08:12 AM Re: Constant Spring Hanger Design [Re: Naveen_Synergy]
kart89 Offline
Member

Registered: 08/17/13
Posts: 34
Loc: kuwait
I think so there will be changes in ambient temperature.

Top
#58139 - 03/16/14 08:14 PM Re: Constant Spring Hanger Design [Re: Naveen_Synergy]
Naveen_Synergy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/12/14
Posts: 4
Loc: Malaysia
Gents,

Thanks for your kind replies.
Basically I made an error in my piping input.
The pressure conversion to metric unit was wrongly done.
Now I'm able to get the similar result.


Thank You,
P.S.Naveen

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 39 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)