Topic Options
#48541 - 04/27/12 12:53 AM ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3
nidh_iges Offline
Member

Registered: 04/27/12
Posts: 52
Loc: INDIA
Dear all,

Can anyone please tell me why we are not preferring ASME B31.3 for GRP stress analysis to ISO 14692 / UKOOA / BS 7159 codes?

Top
#48568 - 04/29/12 03:25 AM Re: ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3 [Re: nidh_iges]
corne Offline
Member

Registered: 07/09/07
Posts: 401
Loc: The Netherlands
BS7159, UKOOA and ISO 14692 (which is mostly based on UKOOA) are codes specifically written for GRP piping. ASME B31.3 has a part on non-metallic piping, but this is far from complete regarding for example load cases and material strength. And it has a very high factor of safety in comparison with the other codes.
I once had a project where the end user insisted on using B31.3 for GRP piping. What I have done is that I first ran all models using UKOOA and reported this results to my client (contractor) and afterwards ran all models again using B31.3 and reported this again, but now for the end user. That is how much I value the B31.3 code for GRP lines.

Top
#48571 - 04/30/12 01:05 AM Re: ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3 [Re: nidh_iges]
nidh_iges Offline
Member

Registered: 04/27/12
Posts: 52
Loc: INDIA
Dear Mr. Corne,

Many thanks for your reply. In fact my client requested to do the FRP analysis with B31.3 and I have to convince them to use ISO 14692.

Regards
Nidh

Top
#52256 - 12/23/12 11:58 PM Re: ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3 [Re: nidh_iges]
nidh_iges Offline
Member

Registered: 04/27/12
Posts: 52
Loc: INDIA
Can we go upto 100% of the allowable stress value during the pipe stress analysis using ISO-14692 code in Caesar???

Regards

Top
#52257 - 12/24/12 12:38 AM Re: ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3 [Re: nidh_iges]
anandh Offline
Member

Registered: 07/23/08
Posts: 21
Loc: India
Hi guys,

No.

We can not Run it using ASME B31.3 for GRP Pipe. As crone said, you can submit two different result.

Top
#52265 - 12/25/12 12:27 AM Re: ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3 [Re: nidh_iges]
nidh_iges Offline
Member

Registered: 04/27/12
Posts: 52
Loc: INDIA
Hi,

But as per ISO-14692 code, we are using factored envelope curve for the stress analysis, so I presume we can consider upto 100% of the allowable stress value.

Regards

Top
#52288 - 12/30/12 04:31 AM Re: ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3 [Re: nidh_iges]
corne Offline
Member

Registered: 07/09/07
Posts: 401
Loc: The Netherlands
You can always allow stresses up to 100% of the allowable stress. That is why it is called ALLOWABLE stress. It would be strange if you may only allow 50% of the allowable stress isn't it?

Make sure you correctly enter all stress values and load factors (f2) in CII though.

Top
#52312 - 01/02/13 07:33 AM Re: ISO 14692 VS ASME B31.3 [Re: nidh_iges]
IMH Offline
Member

Registered: 05/22/12
Posts: 14
Loc: Saudi Arabia
Hi members

could any one give me ISO-14692 code?
and appreciate his help


Thanks

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 52 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)