Topic Options
#36907 - 07/16/10 10:16 AM Modal analysis
Nikhil1981 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/02/10
Posts: 1
Loc: Maharashtra,India
Hi,
While I was doin modal analysis for natural freq. check of a modal, my system was not clearing the sturm check even after increasing the cutoff freq. or even by increasing the eigen values. I searched for guidelines in a application guide and also made some changes accordingly but didnt succeeded.
Can anyone advise me on the problem.

Top
#36909 - 07/16/10 11:52 AM Re: Modal analysis [Re: Nikhil1981]
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6226
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
Failing the "Sturm Sequence Check" simply means there is another natural frequency within %5 of the last frequency extracted. So if the last frequency was 100hz, there is at least one more between 100 and 105, that you may want to consider.

The only way to "consider" these potential frequencies is to increase the cut-off. However, there are some models that will never pass the "Sturm Sequence Check" (such as a cantilever). Failing the "Sturm Sequence Check" doesn't mean there is anything wrong, it just means you need to think about what is going on and consider extending the cut-off.
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay - Consultant

Top
#36917 - 07/17/10 07:18 AM Re: Modal analysis [Re: Richard Ay]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
Maybe using "consistent mass" (as opposed to "lumped mass") might help here. That's a Control Parameter setting.
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 129 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)