The vertical submerged pump used in many sulfuric acid plants has piping "anchor" recommmended by manufacturer,
www.lewispump.com .
While their website does not show installation recommendations, you could request bulletin 185 that has figure 1. that shows 3 elbows from the pump discharge connection to "anchor" that is fixed to the grillage on top of typical tank. The structural support resembles a large "wobble" plate and has some lateral flexibility with the stiff plate axis oriented in the piping axis.
The actual stiffnesses of the "anchor" are much less than the CAESARII default stiffness value. Approximate stiffness could be 1E5 lb/inch , and less for lateral direction. This reduces the large calculated loads from anchor located near the pump. Their bulletin states "Proper installation of constraint will force all pipe expansion away from pump." That may be their intent, but with the CAESARII analysis there will be the large loads with two fixed points of the pump connection and anchor - if no flexibility is included for the anchor or equipment connection.
My opimion is that API 610 has much to say about horizontal pumps, but over-simplifies treatment of vertcal in-line pumps by just applying factor 2X for allowable forces and moments. Critical clearance areas (impellor, bearings) of vertical suspended pumps could be some feet distant from the nozzle loads that would possibly cause distortion of the casing, but API 610 considers vertically suspended pumps same as horizontal pumps in regard to allowable forces and moments. The appendix F of API 610 has examples for horizontal pumps and vertical in-line pumps, but does not have vertical suspended pump example. I would say vertical suspended double casing pump resembles a pendulum such that external loads are somewhat isolated from the loads on the nozzles.