Dear SSW,
Note that, “Design Phase” analysis is typically more difficult because you must make sure that all possible scenarios are simulated. All potential excitation frequencies and gas conditions must be investigated, and all the applicable rules of API 618 must be satisfied. Excessive pulsations can
prevent the effective running of the machine, can damage valves and other mechanical parts, and can produce large shaking forces in the piping. Climate and local ambient air changes can often result in variations in the speed of sound of up to 15%. Typically, you should analyze the variety of gas and ambient conditions as separate load cases. The worst of these will then be used for the mechanical response study.
For your case above, I recommend the following analysis of that part of piping system which vendor has simulated. In my opinion, 20" header acts like a large surge vessel that can reduce pulsation level, of course it's only my guess.
1- Add all structural portals, T-posts, frames, etc. and perform Modal analysis to calculate natural frequencies of the piping system. Compressor will produce shaking forces not only at the basic compressor frequency but also at the higher harmonics. In order to avoid mechanical resonance sufficient separation has to exist between mechanical natural frequencies and the compressor harmonics, i.e. about 20%.
2- Perform Harmonic analysis and apply shaking forces supplied by vendor with phase shift angles between 3 compressors, if any. The resulting pipe, supports and structural stresses are also compared to the fatigue curves for the applicable materials (No. of cycles = 86400 x RPM/60 x days). In most cases, pipe supports and bolts fail sooner than pipe components.
I hope it helps.
Edited by Farhad (10/02/09 09:33 AM)
_________________________
Regards,
Farhad Salehi
--------------
What U give U get back !!!