Topic Options
#27742 - 05/26/09 09:17 PM consideration for dampener
priyan Offline
Member

Registered: 11/12/08
Posts: 62
Loc: singapore
hi to all,

At present i am doing one of my high pressure pipe line. it have 7500 psi.for reducing vibration and maintain a pressure we r introducing one dampener for discharge side.

i do not know how can i consider dampener suction and discharge side.

thanking You.


If i am asking wrong please correct me.




Attachments
720-Dampener.JPG




Edited by priyan (05/27/09 06:47 PM)

Top
#27797 - 05/28/09 06:21 PM Re: consideration for dampener [Re: priyan]
priyan Offline
Member

Registered: 11/12/08
Posts: 62
Loc: singapore


Please Expert give me some suggestion?

Top
#27820 - 05/29/09 08:11 AM Re: consideration for dampener [Re: priyan]
MoverZ Offline
Member

Registered: 11/22/06
Posts: 1195
Loc: Hants, UK
Get some help from a qualified engineer.

Top
#27821 - 05/29/09 08:20 AM Re: consideration for dampener [Re: priyan]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
So, you are referring to a damper used to knock out pressure spikes on the dicsharge side rather than a structural damper used to reduce pipe velocity caused by this pressure pulsation.
Structurally speaking, your damper (bottle) is just a stiffness and mass which can be modeled as a few extra pipes, rigid elements and restraints.
Nice graphic.
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top
#27830 - 05/29/09 06:46 PM Re: consideration for dampener [Re: Dave Diehl]
priyan Offline
Member

Registered: 11/12/08
Posts: 62
Loc: singapore
thanks Dave and MoverZ.

so can i fix ANC for inlet and exhaust nozzle side. and then can i introduce zero rigid weight for in between nozzle connections.

is it correct Dave Diehl.

Top
#27845 - 06/01/09 05:50 AM Re: consideration for dampener [Re: priyan]
PKU Offline
Member

Registered: 08/18/06
Posts: 78
Loc: Aberdeen
It looks to me the pump is reciprocating mud pump. Have you read the pulsation report. They must have listed the unbalanced forces in different zones.
_________________________
PKU

Top
#27850 - 06/01/09 08:30 AM Re: consideration for dampener [Re: priyan]
Dave Diehl Offline
Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 2382
Loc: Houston, TX, USA
I cannot comment on the detail or quality of your model.
You mention anchors at both nozzle connections with a weightless rigid element between them to represent the pump. No, these anchors will isolate the pipe from the pump. If you add temperature to that rigid element you will develop very large anchor loads. Perhaps a better model is to run rigid elements from each nozzle node to the pump base and anchor the base. These rigid elements can then grow to their hot position, displacing these nozzles. If you want to conveniently monitor nozzle loads, use anchors with Node/CNode pairs at the nozzles. I think of these anchors as "relative" anchors (Node/CNode) versus "absolute" anchors.
_________________________
Dave Diehl

Top
#27859 - 06/02/09 01:04 AM Re: consideration for dampener [Re: Dave Diehl]
priyan Offline
Member

Registered: 11/12/08
Posts: 62
Loc: singapore
Thanks Dave diehl and PKU.

thanks for your valuable comments.

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 15 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)