Topic Options
#16287 - 02/27/08 01:19 AM Automatic element subdivision for dynamic analysis?
f00gami Offline
Member

Registered: 01/07/08
Posts: 2
Loc: Europe
Hi there!

I have a few years background in piping analysis and work with pipe stress analysis software. However, I am quite new to CII, which my current employer is using (version 4.50).

Recently I began investigating the dynamic capabilities of this software and found that one has to manually subdivide elements for eigenfrequencies to resolve correctly.

I know other software which perform this automatically "behind the scenes" given a maximum element length. This can be pretty useful e.g. when using an existing model originally designed for static ananlysis as basis for the dynamic analysis.

Is my finding correct? Maybe "automatic subdivision" has been implemented in more recent versions of Caesar II?

Top
#16303 - 02/27/08 07:53 AM Re: Automatic element subdivision for dynamic analysis? [Re: f00gami]
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6226
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
In our humble opinion "automatic subdivision" is a hit or miss affair at best. You can find papers written on this subject, but they only discuss seismic events, or water filled lines, or low carbon steel. The constants in these equations need to change based on your specific analysis.

In Version 5.00 we added an option to use a "consistent mass matrix", instead of the usual "lumped mass formulation" typically applied to piping. This obviates the need for "auto subdivision".
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay - Consultant

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 60 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)