This sounds like the problems i have on relief lines.
The pipework expands like crazy during a fire event, which is operationally opposite to trying to hold it steady during a relief
I try to model the systems as accuratly as i can,
if particullar stresses are sensitive to a particular gap, i try to modify the design to eliminate this sensitivity.
Other wise, i designate the particular support with the gaps as a 'Special' which requires detailed design and site verification.
One thing i am aware of, is acceleration.
I am observant that the larger the gap and hence the farther the pipe is allowed to travel (due to non steady loading - wind/relief/earthquake?)
then the acceleration and hence momentum of the pipe starts to become critical.
I would think the answer to your problem is to use nominal support gaps only +/-2mm
and to not have the pipework in an unstable and unguided manner during the occasional event.
Then again, i have never done earthquake.
_________________________
Best Regards