Topic Options
#1337 - 10/07/03 11:40 PM non linear restraint
streng Offline
Member

Registered: 09/25/03
Posts: 3
Loc: Ina
Dear all,

I am a new Caesar user.
i have a simple model which using resting support +Y on it. when i change the support to Y, it has a different result in restraint summary.
During static analysis, which one is more valid, using support type Y or +Y ?
How about the using of Gap for stopper or guide ?
is there any theory regarding this matter ?
your help will be highly appreciated.
thank you.
_________________________
regards,

Top
#1338 - 10/08/03 07:12 AM Re: non linear restraint
Richard Ay Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/99
Posts: 6226
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
The fact that you got different results between the system with the "+Y" versus the "Y" is not surprising. A "+Y" is a nonlinear support, it has no stiffness in the "up" direction, while it is rigid in the "down" direction. A "Y" on the other hand is rigid in both the "up" and "down" directions. As soon as you have non-linear supports in your system, the software must iterate for a solution. This does not occur if you system consists of only linear supports.

Quote:
During static analysis, which one is more valid, using support type Y or +Y ?
Neither, they both have their applications. You should use which ever one is or will be actually in the real system in the field.

Quote:
How about the using of Gap for stopper or guide ?
Again, these have their applications. You should use what actually reflects the real system.

Quote:
is there any theory regarding this matter ?
Only experience and company procedures / policies.
_________________________
Regards,
Richard Ay - Consultant

Top



Moderator:  Denny_Thomas, uribejl 
Who's Online
0 registered (), 42 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Stats
12065 Members
14 Forums
16973 Topics
75151 Posts

Max Online: 303 @ 01/28/20 11:58 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)