|
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
In the later versions of c2 (Version 11 and later) you need to apply the multiplier for both wind and seismic loads. For seismic this would be 0.7*U and for wind it would be 0.6WIN. For Versions prior to Version 11, consult the documentation.
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
I think seismic analysis of buried piping should have a completely different approach. Something like this https://rb.gy/5hmf0u
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Good morning Dave, According to what you comment, I would like to clarify a bit what I understood from your comment, if I perform a dynamic analysis under B31.4 I will not be able to obtain the admissible for efforts within the dynamic response? Sh
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Dave Diehl According to what you mention if I carry out in cases of static load the combinations for earthquake in operation as follows: P + T + W + U1 P + T + W-U1 P + T + W + U2 P + T + W-U2 P + T + W + U3 P + T + W-U3 Is the system already mul
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Issue solved. Thanks Mr. Ay I'm very honoured to have received a reply from you.
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
How can I simulate in the dynamic module of Caesar II the load cases for earthquakes that the civil area that was used to simulate a cable-stayed bridge which supports a pipeline provided me Dead weight D Fluid (water in pipe) F Preestres P Earthqua
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Why in the load report it gives me a similar load in dynamic Caesar II when I evaluate earthquake in the same node for different load cases
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
I guess nobody wants to convince you "to use a snubber to arrest the vibration, i.e. increase the natural frequency of the system". Snubbers are rather shock absorbers, which in such applications form restraints between piping and the structure. The
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Thanks all for your responses, still...I am not convinced to use a snubber to arrest the vibration. (Ie increase the natural frequency of the system). let us take cases of a transfer line system that vibrates in the startup/shutdown cases and used a
|
|
PV Elite
|
|
I cannot answer to your question (maybe someone from Hexagon can do it), but I recommend you to download a good document where lambda_C is better explained than in Div 2, choosing a free link by google search " Miller Shell Structures ".
|
|
CADWorx ISOGEN
|
|
Ah, I found it, It was easier then I thought. Admin can delete the posts.
|
|
CADWorx ISOGEN
|
|
Hello, question from the subject, how to add piping supports in the material list of isometric drawing?
|
|
CADWorx ISOGEN
|
|
What are you wanting to do with the PCF ? You could export an enhanced PCF with the C2PCF command, but that generally does not create an Isometric.
|
|
PV Elite
|
|
Dear all For a Division 2 vessel, Straight Face of a Cone to Flange joint is modeled as a cylinder and analyzed for Combined loadings as per 4.4.12.2. As a result, Below warning occurs since LamdaC is exceeding 1.2. However the PV Elite report does n
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Hi Vick, You can consult to expansion joint vendor with suitable experience in slurry piping. So far I haven't experience such application. Ultimately, the vendor needs to consider the fluid in the expansion joint in the serviceability of the EJ. C
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Thanks Borzki & Pat for your response. However, considering pump with spring is always risky option. we need to model basplate/motor etc properly in CAESAR II simulation. Instead i thought to put the exchanger on spring. At present, i had consider
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Vick, Consider mounting the pump on a spring base. See Goulds Pumps Manual GPM 9 page 267. The photograph is of a Goulds Pump/motor mounted on a spring base and looks very much like one of my installations for a circulating pump on a strong black
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Hi Vick, As long as you satisfy all the criteria in your project specification you should be fine. Please note that expansion bellows have a certain criteria such as unity check. Refer to EJMA. What's the temperature of the line and the density*velo
|
|
CAESAR II
|
|
Thanks Borzki for your response. However, as per stress analysis, this circuit is not working without bellows. Therefore, i am going with attached arrangements. Any opinion/Suggestion on this is highly appreciated especially for type & location of
|
